January 2017
« Dec    


"Nudity is our ideal state, our pure state, our natural state, our default state. Clothing is always a deviation from the default and is, therefore, a compromise and an aberration.."



Proud Nudist

Naturist Inside

Nudist Textile World

sleep naked

no shame

naturist values

Rick Romig
I'm a member of:
The Naktiv Network

"Body shame originates in our minds with our thoughts and perceptions. Neither our religion nor our culture makes us ashamed of our bodies, only our belief that we should be ashamed. Shame comes from our own thoughts which we have the power to change. If we perceive no shame then there is none. No one can make you feel ashamed without your permission."

The Awesome Power of Breasts Revisited

A dangerous pair of boobs?

I am still dumfounded and amazed that the simple act of exposing a breast, either intentionally or accidentally, can cause such an uproar. Ours is one of the very few societies in the free world where anyone has a problem with naked breasts. The following raises a valid point about the ruckus. What, exactly, is the problem with bare breasts in America? We are virtually the only society in the world that has a problem with it. Not even the British are as uptight about breasts as we are.

[Naturist News] Digest Number 337
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 09:57:00 -0800
From: “Don & Peggy”
Subject: Society’s “boobs”

An editorial by Bennett Haselton, from Peacefire.org, inspired by the now-famous Super-bowl “wardrobe malfunction”:

Insiders say that the FCC will soon announce its decision to uphold the $550,000 fine against CBS for Janet Jackson’s wardrobe malfunction.

I usually don’t send out pure opinion pieces, but let it be said: There is not one person anywhere who can give you a good reason why it’s OK to show a man’s chest on TV, but not a woman’s chest. You can ask over 100 people why – trust me, I have – and not get a real answer. It’s just a silly superstition that some people came up with, a bunch of others went along with it, and now we’re stuck with it.

Have you ever heard a real reason?

This is different from other issues, like abortion, affirmative action, or the death penalty – I have opinions on all of those, and probably so do you, but there are two sides to each issue, and I can at least see where the other side is coming from. But I’ve never heard the other side of the boob issue.

A good sign of a widespread belief that has no supporting logic is that if you ask people why they believe it, they always pass the buck on to someone else. “Our society has decided…” “The community feels that…” “Judges have ruled that…” – except with that last one, if you listen to what judges say, they pass the buck too, saying “According to contemporary community standards…” What’s missing is someone standing up and saying “I, yes *ME* *PERSONALLY*, I believe that seeing a mammary gland is harmful, and here’s why.”

To people who say that inciting any male lust is bad, I tell them I grew up in Denmark (although I’m American) and there you could see bare breasts in public advertisements, on the covers of supermarket tabloids, and on the beach, and nobody cared. And the sex crime rate is much lower there. It’s not obvious that nudity even incites much “lust” once you’re used to it anyway – men live in nudist colonies surrounded by naked women and don’t get turned on. (It’s the visitors who are easy to spot, because they aren’t used to it and it makes them stick out, so to speak.)

Some people would say that boobs are hardly an important issue, and they have a point. But the larger issue is about critical thinking – it’s harmful to our ability to debate issues rationally if large numbers of people support rules and laws without knowing why. What’s the silliest thing you can get people to believe? If you can get large numbers of people to believe that seeing a photo of a mammary gland is harmful, well, where could you even go from there?

I think history will judge us by how many people stood up and said, THIS IS STUPID. It won’t be quite as awkward as when kids ask their grandparents, “Grandpa, which side were you on in the civil rights movement?” But people are still going to look back and wonder what the HELL we were thinking.

– Bennett Haselton

http://channels.lockergnome.com/political/archives/20060228_fcc_boobs_uphold_janet_jackson_fine.phtml or http://tinyurl.com/rj9h8

Is there a logical, proven argument that breasts are harmful? I know I haven’t heard one. They’re obscene? Mothers feed their babies with them. Would you give a child something obscene? If men become sexually aroused by the sight of a bare breast, that tells me that the man is more than likely sexually immature and adolescent.

I spent eight years in Europe. I saw breasts on television, billboards, and on the street. Only Americans seemed to be titillated by it. I frequented many coed facilities in Europe where nude men and women shared saunas, whirlpool baths, swimming pools, showers, and changing facilities where not only was nudity common, it was expected. It was usually easy to spot the Americans. They were the ones wrapped in towels and staring.

Let’s admit it, American society is very repressive. Often what we repress is harmful only because we repress it. After we hold in our repression for a long time, it comes out, usually in a harmful way.

Another dangerous pair of boobs?

Comments are closed.